Submarines: ideal fuel cell vehicles

July 13, 2007 - Exclusive By Dallas Kachan, Cleantech Group

Fuel cells apparently make a good submarine hard to find.

Air Products of Pennsylvania this week announced it supplied a new fueling station to supply a state-of-the-art HDW 214 submarine of the Hellenic (Greek) Navy with hydrogen.

The first fueling of its kind in Greece took place this week in Skaramanga, near Athens.

Air Products supplied the integral components of the hydrogen fueling station to the submarine's designer, Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (HDW), which has been experimenting with fuel cell technology for submarines since the late 1970s.

HDW's Class 212 and 214 non-nuclear submarines have been developed to use a silent operating fuel cell plant that runs on nine 34-kilowatt Siemens polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) hydrogen fuel cells.

Its air-independent fuel cell propulsion system provides extreme underwater endurance, diving depth and overall efficiency, HDW claims.

The fuel cells, which produce electrical energy from oxygen and hydrogen, allow the submarine to cruise under water for up to three weeks without resurfacing.

Perhaps most importantly, however, because the chemical reactions of fuel cells make no noise and produce no detectable exhaust heat, they make the submarine virtually undetectable, according to designers.

Fuel cell submarine

Props for fuel cells.

Conventional diesel-electric submarines typically deplete their battery power after only a few days under water. Nuclear submarines can cruise for months under water, but not everybody wants nuclear submarines, especially if there are alternatives.

Plus, says HDW, fuel cells are still quieter.

The submarine was built by Hellenic Shipyards S.A., part of the new North European shipyard ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, which also owns HDW. Germany has four of the boats, with two more on order, and Italy has bought two.

Hellenic Shipyards is planning to build more fuel cell-powered submarines for the Hellenic Navy. And additional contracts are in place to add plug-in fuel cell retrofits to conventional driven submarines.

Air Products is a leader in hydrogen safety and engineering, and in hydrogen production and distribution, including hydrogen fueling stations. It also supplies industrial gases and associated equipment to other industries.

The company has developed some 70 hydrogen fueling installations worldwide.

Coverage brought to you by

Comments

How different the world

How different the world would be today if 40 years ago we had replaced all fossil fuels with nuclear power. We wouldn’t be at war in the Middle East…There would be no power shortages…Our electric bill would be a fraction of what it is today…we would all be driving cars powered by hydrogen and nobody would be worrying about global warming.

Now That’s a Real “Inconvenient Truth.”

Ralph
ralph@nucleargreen.org

not true

Actually I agree with you. We don't need to invent a super source of energy that is flawless or anything we already have nuclear. However people would still use fossil fuels until the ran out because it would be cheaper the the nuclear power and nuclear power still has emitions so it unlike gas with research we can power the amount of them.

A different world?

You've got to be kidding me. You sound like my freakin' religion teacher. And believe me, thats not a good thing.

First, if we had replaced all of our power sources with nuclear power 40 years ago, our country would PROBABLY be bankrupt. Do you have any godly idea how expensive nuclear powerplants are to run and maintain?

Second, what about when the radioactive materials that we use for them are no longer efficient, where are we gonna put all of that crap?

Third, the war in Iraq was caused by the need/want for oil? Jesus Christ! That means that the government is trying to control my mind with x-rays! I need to run around in a foil suit to keep from becoming a mindless drone!

fuel cell

what kind of fuel cell is this article?

no ones right no ones wrong

use all have good argument but both sources have their ups and downs.
- to have our homes run through nuclear energy would be expensive buy know anyway because of government tax and all that shit
- and the "super source" would be very much the same way.
but yes we wouldn't have global warming that how you are right

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Become a cleantech industry insider - sign up for our free newsletter